<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Peter's Blog - Nodes for beast</title>
    <link>http://www.petersblog.org/</link>
    <description>Nodes containing the tag beast</description>
    <item>
      <title>Recipe for Happiness</title>
      <link>http://www.petersblog.org/node/view/1214</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Here is a recipe for happiness: 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Ingredients&lt;/b&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="/tag/wow"&gt;World of Warcraft&lt;/a&gt; up and running after three days 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="/tag/beast"&gt;The beast&lt;/a&gt;, my bargain powerhouse pc 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="/node/1213"&gt;Dell 24 inch widescreen monitor&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Directions&lt;/b&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;
Start up computer 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Log on to World of Warcraft 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Up display settings to 1920x1200 widescreen 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Enjoy 
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
I found myself admiring the scenery: rolling snow covered hills, pine forests, sun filled skies. Because I had been offline for three days resting in an inn the game decided to boost my experience and I was soon on level 8 (not sure of the logic of doing nothing increasing experience). Bought a big hammer and can now dispatch level 8 monsters with ease. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
And it's friday!!! 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Life is good. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Related Posts: &lt;a href="/tag/beast"&gt;beast&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="/tag/dell"&gt;dell&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="/tag/warcraft"&gt;warcraft&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="/tag/wow"&gt;wow&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.petersblog.org/node/view/1214</guid>
      <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">beast</category>
      <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">dell</category>
      <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">warcraft</category>
      <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">wow</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dell 2405FPW Monitor</title>
      <link>http://www.petersblog.org/node/view/1213</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
When I decided to get &lt;a href="/node/1195"&gt;the Beast&lt;/a&gt; I decided to treat myself to a BIG monitor. I felt the 30inch Dell monitor was too big, even after seeing 30 inch monitors in the apple shop. They also have pretty demanding video card requirements. After a while I decided on a Dell 24 inch, mainly because although it is widescreen, vertically it is still taller than the 19 inch CRTs I am used to. I cherish height more than width and 19 inch widescreen monitors I've seen look too small. &lt;a href="http://www.europc.co.uk"&gt;Europc&lt;/a&gt; were selling the Dell 24 inch cheap (relatively). 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It came today and it is pretty breathtaking: 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;
I set the video resolution to 1920x1200 and there is so much screen space, I have to turn my head to pan from corner to corner. 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
It has a built in four port USB hub. 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
It has a built in flash card reader (compact, SD etc). 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
It does picture in picture: I could have a TV picture in the corner via the svideo input if I so desired (and there would be plenty of screen left). 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
I downloaded some 1920x1200 wallpapers and these look amazing. Loaded up &lt;a href="/tag/picasa"&gt;picasa&lt;/a&gt; and looked at my photo album and whee. 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Height and tilt adjustable 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Screen rotates 90 degrees, should I want about 20 inches vertical height. 
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
May have to start using my glasses at home. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Related Posts: &lt;a href="/tag/beast"&gt;beast&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="/tag/dell"&gt;dell&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="/tag/whee"&gt;whee&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.petersblog.org/node/view/1213</guid>
      <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">beast</category>
      <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">dell</category>
      <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">whee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Living with the Beast</title>
      <link>http://www.petersblog.org/node/view/1199</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
The &lt;a href="/node/1195"&gt;Beast&lt;/a&gt; continues to amaze. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I've never really thought about it before but here is cpu utilisation while playing 'Freak on a Leash' by Korn in iTunes: 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align:center"&gt;&lt;img src="/images/cpu.jpg" alt="images/cpu.jpg"/&gt;&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
This is the windows task manager. Points to note: 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;
two cpu cores so two cpus displayed 
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
neither is working very hard: 0%. The little spikes are where the track started. While running it normally shows 0% with the occasional 1% glitch. 
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
I've never tried this on a lesser pc. Thinking about it now, a pair of 2.4Ghz cpu's should have no trouble generating a pair of 44kHz audio signals: simplistically, that's 54545 clock cycles for each 44kHz cycle. Decoding mp4 files is probably more challenging than shifting the contents of a wav file to a dac but 54545 clock cycles seems like plenty to play with. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Related Posts: &lt;a href="/tag/beast"&gt;beast&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="/tag/dell"&gt;dell&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.petersblog.org/node/view/1199</guid>
      <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">beast</category>
      <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">dell</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
